Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marios Vodas <mvodas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use
Date: 2011-09-29 16:55:29
Message-ID: 401.1317315329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marios Vodas <mvodas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> If I'm not wrong, temporary tables stay in memory if they do not go over
> temp_buffers limit (e.g. if temp_buffers is 2GB and the size of the table is
> 300MB the table will remain in memory).
> What if a column is variable length (e.g. text), how does this column stay
> in-memory since it should be stored in TOAST?

Well, the toast table is also temp, so it'll get cached in temp_buffers
as well, as long as it fits.

> When I build a GiST index on a temporary table does the index stay in memory
> as well?

Same answer.

Keep in mind that temp_buffers is per process, not global. Just as with
work_mem, you need to be careful about setting it sky-high.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2011-09-29 16:55:54 Re: pg_upgrade - add config directory setting
Previous Message Marios Vodas 2011-09-29 16:47:53 Temporary tables and in-memory use