>>All in all, hard coding in the delay, would aggravate me and quite a few
>>others; can't you hear it, "Why the *#!##(at)$ is this taking so long?"
>Just in case there is a misunderstanding, this was never, ever, part of
>the plan or implementation. The 'throttle' code was driven by a command
>option...
It was... my apologies...
Thomas
-
- Thomas Swan
- Graduate Student - Computer Science
- The University of Mississippi
-
- "People can be categorized into two fundamental
- groups, those that divide people into two groups
- and those that don't."
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?= | Date: 2000-08-01 11:57:25 |
| Subject: Re: RPMs built for Mandrake |
| Previous: | From: Philip Warner | Date: 2000-08-01 06:54:49 |
| Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |
pgsql-general by date
| Next: | From: luc00 | Date: 2000-08-01 08:35:14 |
| Subject: Embedded SQL C++ preprocessor ? |
| Previous: | From: Philip Warner | Date: 2000-08-01 06:54:49 |
| Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |