My $.02 ...
:)
Anyway, the command line option makes the most sense. An arbitrary or
relative sleep timer specified as an option is an ideal way to go about
it. I really liked the
pg_dump -T {pick a number, any number} idea. maybe a -d for delay or
something...
Note: A command line option is not too difficult for someone to use. (I
saw someone mention this.) If you're using a GUI and rely on it... get
someone to add a check box for the option. Otherwise if your actually
using a command-line utility, you've got the hardest part licked... (It's
a nice FAQ item, why is my db so slow when doing a backup? ... how can I
fix this? ...)
This seems a little rhetorical in some respects... I would want a backup or
dump of the DB to hit as quickly as possible... (scheduled for a low load
time). But if, hypothetically, the load is constant, then a more relaxed
backup might be in order...
All in all, hard coding in the delay, would aggravate me and quite a few
others; can't you hear it, "Why the *#!##(at)$ is this taking so long?"
-
- Thomas Swan
- Graduate Student - Computer Science
- The University of Mississippi
-
- "People can be categorized into two fundamental
- groups, those that divide people into two groups
- and those that don't."
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Philip Warner | Date: 2000-08-01 06:54:49 |
| Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |
| Previous: | From: Thomas Lockhart | Date: 2000-08-01 06:35:20 |
| Subject: Re: RPMs built for Mandrake |
pgsql-general by date
| Next: | From: Philip Warner | Date: 2000-08-01 06:54:49 |
| Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |
| Previous: | From: brianb-pggeneral | Date: 2000-08-01 05:36:58 |
| Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump & performance degradation |