Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?
Date: 2001-10-08 13:42:34
Message-ID: 4.2.0.58.20011008150521.01538f00@pop.freesurf.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

Dear all,

1) CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
In pgAdmin II, we plan to use the CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION if the patch
is applied. Do you know if there is any chance it be applied for beta time?
We would very much appreciate this feature...

2) PL/pgSQL default support
It is sometimes tricky for Windows users to install a language remotely on
a Linux box (no access to createlang and/or no knowledge of handlers). So
why not enable PL/pgSQL by default?

Best regards,
Jean-Michel POURE

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-10-08 14:02:17 Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNC
Previous Message Dave Page 2001-10-06 08:39:26 Splash Screen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-10-08 13:49:46 Temprary issue gripes(was:Re: cvs problem)
Previous Message Horak Daniel 2001-10-08 12:55:49 Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?