Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tree structure

From: Zeljko Trogrlic <zeljko(at)technologist(dot)com>
To: kovacsz <zoli(at)pc10(dot)radnoti-szeged(dot)sulinet(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tree structure
Date: 2000-09-12 10:51:59
Message-ID: 4.1.20000912124859.018dbc88@192.168.0.7 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql
Thanks for your offer, I'll be very interested to see how you did that. I
also found very interesting solution at

http://www.dbmsmag.com/9603d06.html
http://www.dbmsmag.com/9604d06.html
http://www.dbmsmag.com/9605d06.html

At 11:22 12.9.2000 , kovacsz wrote:
>We are using tree structures (and partially ordered trees) with
>PostgreSQL. After the beginning success we got into speed problems. With
>special plus tables, triggers and functions now we have a reasonably fast
>database which contains about 5-10 tree structures. If you are interested,
>I may send you some of these part of our database. But, PostgreSQL "from 
>base" doesn't support tree structures, neither recursions (like in SQL3), 
>as far as I know (see TODO list).



In response to

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Trewern, BenDate: 2000-09-12 14:52:31
Subject: RE: Tree structure
Previous:From: Max PyziurDate: 2000-09-12 03:03:26
Subject: Re: [SQL] Re: [BUGS] "ORDER BY" issue - is this a bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group