Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

From: John Brothers <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Date: 2000-01-28 03:51:40
Message-ID: 4.1.20000127224856.00c97350@pop.mindspring.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-sql
I don't think that patch will work - Hiroshi whipped up that patch for me a
week ago for a
different problem - we have a table with duplicate primary keys, which
seems to be
an arithmetic overflow problem because the index key values can be both
very large positive
and very large negative numbers.


At 11:37 AM 1/27/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Could you try the follwoing patch ?
>
>Hiroshi, I don't see this in the main tree, nor do I see it having been
>requested for application. Should I apply it?
>
>> 
>> Regards.
>> 
>> Hiroshi Inoue

------------
johnbr(at)incanta(dot)net

        

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-01-28 04:10:03
Subject: OR-of-ANDs dragon slain ... or at least seriously wounded ...
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-01-28 03:48:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found'

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-01-28 04:40:56
Subject: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous:From: John BrothersDate: 2000-01-28 03:48:39
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-01-28 04:40:56
Subject: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous:From: John BrothersDate: 2000-01-28 03:48:39
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group