Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

From: John Brothers <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Date: 2000-01-28 03:51:40
Message-ID: 4.1.20000127224856.00c97350@pop.mindspring.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

I don't think that patch will work - Hiroshi whipped up that patch for me a
week ago for a
different problem - we have a table with duplicate primary keys, which
seems to be
an arithmetic overflow problem because the index key values can be both
very large positive
and very large negative numbers.

At 11:37 AM 1/27/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Could you try the follwoing patch ?
>
>Hiroshi, I don't see this in the main tree, nor do I see it having been
>requested for application. Should I apply it?
>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Hiroshi Inoue

------------
johnbr(at)incanta(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-01-28 04:40:56 RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous Message John Brothers 2000-01-28 03:48:39 Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-28 04:10:03 OR-of-ANDs dragon slain ... or at least seriously wounded ...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-01-28 03:48:42 Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found'

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-01-28 04:40:56 RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous Message John Brothers 2000-01-28 03:48:39 Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4