On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the
> query cancel problem. It really seems to me that this is the way
> forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation
> rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it.
Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample?
Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it
in the conf file.
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-03-11 01:01:05|
|Subject: Re: Warning about invalid .pgpass passwords|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2010-03-10 23:58:35|
|Subject: Re: renameatt() can rename attribute of index, sequence,