On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> HOWEVER, I do believe this is an issue we could live with for 9.0 if
>>> it's going to lead to a whole lot of additional debugging of SR.  But if
>>> it's an easy fix, it'll avoid a lot of complaints on pgsql-general.
>>
>> I think that the latter statement is right.
>
> Though we've not reached consensus on smart shutdown during
> recovery yet, I wrote the patch that changes its behavior:
> shut down the server (including the startup process and the
> walreceiver) as soon as all read-only connections have died.
> The code is also available in the 'replication' branch in
> my git repository.
>
> And, let's discuss whether something like the attached patch
> is required for v9.0 or not.

There is no post about this for over a month. Can I remove this
from TODO item of SR for 9.0? Thought? Objection?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

• Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown at 2010-02-01 02:49:04 from Fujii Masao

Responses

• Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown at 2010-03-04 14:55:10 from Greg Stark

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Kevin Grittner	Date: 2010-03-04 12:48:18
	Subject: Re: problem about inet
Previous:	From: Fujii Masao	Date: 2010-03-04 12:00:33
	Subject: Re: Incrementally Updated Backups and restartpoints