On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> HOWEVER, I do believe this is an issue we could live with for 9.0 if
>>> it's going to lead to a whole lot of additional debugging of SR. But if
>>> it's an easy fix, it'll avoid a lot of complaints on pgsql-general.
>> I think that the latter statement is right.
> Though we've not reached consensus on smart shutdown during
> recovery yet, I wrote the patch that changes its behavior:
> shut down the server (including the startup process and the
> walreceiver) as soon as all read-only connections have died.
> The code is also available in the 'replication' branch in
> my git repository.
> And, let's discuss whether something like the attached patch
> is required for v9.0 or not.
There is no post about this for over a month. Can I remove this
from TODO item of SR for 9.0? Thought? Objection?
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-03-04 12:48:18|
|Subject: Re: problem about inet|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-03-04 12:00:33|
|Subject: Re: Incrementally Updated Backups and restartpoints|