I thought of this issue again since the related question arrived.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> No, that's not an issue. We only wait for the backup-end record if we
>> haven't seen yet since we started recovery from the base backup.
>> Assuming the standby had reached that point already before the new
>> backup from the standby started, backupStartLoc is zero in the control file.
> OK. That assumption should be documented?
This comment is meaningless. Sorry for noise.
> And, when we start an archive recovery from the backup from the standby,
> we seem to reach a safe starting point before database has actually become
> consistent. It's because backupStartLoc is zero. Isn't this an issue?
This issue seems to still happen. So should this be fixed for 9.0?
Or only writing a note in document is enough for 9.0? I'm leaning
towards the latter.
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-03-05 17:32:01|
|Subject: startup or start-up|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-03-03 03:14:18|
|Subject: Re: CREATE FUNCTION reference page's Notes section is
getting out of hand|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-03-04 12:11:36|
|Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-03-04 11:53:04|
|Subject: Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds|