| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete |
| Date: | 2010-02-25 02:07:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb1002241807q11c93f00oe92e808e14c0124a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The one thing I'm undecided about is whether we want the immediate
> NOTICE, as opposed to dialing down the time till the first WARNING
> to something like 5 or 10 seconds. I think the main argument for the
> latter approach would be to avoid log-spam in normal operation.
> Although Greg is correct that a NOTICE wouldn't be logged at default
> log levels, lots of people don't use that default. Comments?
I don't want that immediate NOTICE message, which sounds like a noise.
Delaying it or changing the log level to DEBUG work for me.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-02-25 02:15:32 | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-02-25 02:01:49 | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete |