On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> That's actually a bit questionable, always has been even in pg_standby.
> It adds a constant 1 s delay to the recovery each WAL file, which
> effectively rate-limits the WAL recovery to 16MB per second. I think we
> should rather add a warning to the docs, suggesting the copy-then-rename
> method on Windows.

Right. Adding a warning to the docs looks enough.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

• Re: Streaming Replication docs at 2010-02-12 10:15:31 from Heikki Linnakangas

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Streaming Replication docs at 2010-02-12 18:22:43 from Josh Berkus

pgsql-docs by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2010-02-12 12:51:20
	Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2010-02-12 10:15:31
	Subject: Re: Streaming Replication docs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tim Bunce	Date: 2010-02-12 10:40:13
	Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Previous:	From: Fujii Masao	Date: 2010-02-12 10:15:32
	Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq