Streaming replication and SSL

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Streaming replication and SSL
Date: 2010-02-03 04:38:03
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1002022038t89fb8e8ue00f649bebb8377f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> 1. Walsender calls pq_wait() which calls select(), waiting for timeout,
> or data to become available for reading in the underlying socket.
>
> 2. Client issues an SSL renegotiation by sending a message to the server
>
> 3. Server receives the message, and select() returns indicating that
> data has arrived
>
> 4. Walsender calls HandleEndOfRep() which calls pq_getbyte().
> pq_readbyte() calls SSL_read(), which receives the renegotiation message
> and handles it. No application data has arrived, however, so SSL_read()
> blocks for some to arrive. It never does.

What is the trigger of the renegotiation? The backend initiates it
when the amount of data sent exceeds the RENEGOTIATION_LIMIT (which
is defined in src/backend/libpq/be-secure.c). OTOH, I cannot find
the code that the libpq explicitly does that. So I wonder if client
(i.e., walreceiver in this case) really sends the SSL renegotiation
message. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-03 04:38:33 Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-03 04:30:31 Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]