Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication status

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Date: 2010-01-18 03:03:06
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001171903u3605d960w5ffbde27737b4377@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> * amount of *time* since last successful archive (this would be a good
> trigger for alerts)
> * number of failed archive attempts
> * number of archive files awaiting processing (presumably monitored by
> the slave)
> * last archive file processed by the slave, and when

Are these for warm-standby, not SR? At least SR isn't so much
involved in WAL archiving, i.e, WAL is sent to the standby by
walsender instead of an archiver.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2010-01-18 03:44:18
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix portalmem.c to avoid keeping a dangling pointer to a cached
Previous:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2010-01-18 02:57:21
Subject: Re: attoptions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group