Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication status

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Date: 2010-01-13 05:34:26
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001122134y67463a16m49960f2e98548ab3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I am concerned that knowledge of this new read-only replication user
> would have to be spread all over the backend code, which is really not
> something we should be doing at this stage in 8.5 development.  I am
> also thinking such a special user might fall out of work on mandatory
> access control, so maybe we should just require super-user for 8.5 and
> revisit this for 8.6.

OK. I leave that code as it is. If the majority feel it's overkill to
require a superuser privilege when authenticating the standby, we can
just drop it later.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-13 05:34:40
Subject: Re: xml2 still essential for us
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-13 05:11:47
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group