Re: Streaming replication status

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Date: 2010-01-12 03:59:30
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001111959m2978c507n59fd490828aa3a8f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> Personally, I'd be uncomfortable enabling something like that without _both_
> an admin alert _and_ the ability to refresh the slave's base backup without
> admin intervention.

What feature do you specifically need as an alert? Just writing
the warning into the logfile is enough? Or need to notify by
using SNMP trap message? Though I'm not sure if this is a role
of Postgres.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-01-12 04:15:55 Re: damage control mode
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-01-12 03:45:41 Re: Streaming replication status