Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Application name patch - v4

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Date: 2009-11-30 01:01:55
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0911291701g4ab6f15exbe288d31a88aeea9@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> Updated application name patch, including a GUC assign hook to clean
>> the application name of any unsafe characters, per discussion.
>
> Applied with assorted editorialization.  There were a couple of
> definitional issues that I don't recall if we had consensus on:

Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample?
That is expected to be set from only libpq?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ron MayerDate: 2009-11-30 01:03:41
Subject: Re: cvs chapters in our docs
Previous:From: Florian G. PflugDate: 2009-11-30 00:16:43
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group