From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status |
Date: | 2009-08-11 14:54:22 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0908110754g52eded67uc434b196a5be9c40@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> We should probably have a separate discussion about what the least
>> committable unit would be for this patch. I wonder if it might be
>> sufficient to provide a facility for streaming WAL, plus a standalone
>> tool for receving it and storing it to a file. This might be designed
>> as an improvement on our existing concept of an archive; the advantage
>> would be that you could have all but perhaps the last few seconds of
>> WAL if the primary kicked the bucket, rather than being behind by up
>> to checkpoint_timeout. Allowing the WAL to be received directly by
>> PostgreSQL could be a future enhancement.
>> That's an interesting idea. That would essentially be another method to set up a WAL archive. I'm not sure it's worthwhile on its own, but once we have the wal-sender infrastructure in place it should be easy to write such a tool.
>
> It most definitely would be useful on it's own. I have several
> installations where we'd love such a capability.
Yeah, this is my initial proposal for WAL receiving side. I think
that it's useful to provide such tool as a contrib (or pgfoundry)
program.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-10/msg01639.php
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-08-11 15:12:38 | Re: "Hot standby"? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-08-11 14:30:26 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |