Hi,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The attached latest patch provides this capability. You can easily set up the
>> synch rep according to the following procedure.
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NTT%27s_Development_Projects#How_to_set_up_Synch_Rep
>
> This patch no longer applies cleanly. Can you rebase and resubmit it
> for the upcoming CommitFest? It might also be good to go through and
> clean up the various places where you have trailing whitespace and/or
> spaces preceding tabs.
Sure. I'll resubmit the patch after fixing some bugs and finishing
the documents.
> Given that this is a substantial patch, I have a couple of questions
> about strategy. First, I am wondering whether this patch should be
> reviewed (and committed) as a whole, or whether there are distinct
> chunks of it that should be reviewed and committed separately -
> particularly the signal handling piece, which AIUI is independently
> useful. I note that it seems to be included in the tarball as a
> separate patch file, which is very useful.
I think that the latter strategy makes more sense. At least, the signal
handling piece and non-blocking pqcomm (communication between
a frontend and a backend) can be reviewed independently of synch rep
itself.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Fujii Masao | Date: 2009-07-03 04:45:39 |
| Subject: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby |
| Previous: | From: Alvaro Herrera | Date: 2009-07-03 02:59:34 |
| Subject: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from theprimary to the standby |