From: | "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |
Date: | 2008-12-03 12:37:36 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0812030437u4f9f56b3p6e78208b86a0dfb5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:37 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>> Thanks for taking many hours to review the code!!
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Can you confirm that all the docs on the Wiki page are up to date? There
>> > are a few minor discrepancies that make me think it isn't.
>>
>> Documentation is ongoing. Sorry for my slow progress.
>>
>> BTW, I'm going to add and change the sgml files listed on wiki.
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NTT%27s_Development_Projects#Documentation_Plan
>
> I'm patient, I know it takes time. Happy to spend hours on the review,
> but I want to do that knowing I agree with the higher level features and
> architecture first.
Since I thought that the figure was more intelligible for some people
than my poor English, I illustrated the architecture first.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NTT%27s_Development_Projects#Detailed_Design
Are there any other parts which should be illustrated for review?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-12-03 12:49:15 | pg_get_keywords descriptions |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-12-03 12:28:03 | Re: maintenance memory vs autovac |