Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-03 05:00:20
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0812022100u14f863et9d9cc51e0a85d42@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Breaking down of patch into sections works very well for review. Should
>> allow us to get different reviewers on different parts of the code -
>> review wranglers please take note: Dave, Josh.
>
> Fujii-san, could you break the patch up into several parts? We have quite
> a few junior reviewers who are idle right now.

Yes, I divided the patch into 9 pieces. Do I need to divide it further?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Koichi Suzuki 2008-12-03 05:22:14 Re: V2 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2008-12-03 04:26:12 Re: pg_stop_backup wait bug fix