Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!

From: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chrisking(dot)com>
To: pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!
Date: 2006-09-20 17:53:25
Message-ID: 3caa6e8d47fb20ae63db2d13025fb28a@chrisking.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pdxpug
On Sep 20, 2006, at 10:29 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:

> On Sep 20, 2006, at 09:03, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>
>> The general consensus was that she should upgrade.  We didn't have a 
>> clear answer to why the query was so slow in the older version, but 
>> it was clear that it was faster in the newer version of postgresql.
>
> Actually, I think that the consensus was that she should try 
> increasing the sort_mem on the 7.4 database to see if that helps. But 
> upgrading is a no-brainer, too. :-)

Oh, right!  I remember that now.  Thanks!

happy to be in consensus for real this time,
-selena


In response to

pdxpug by date

Next:From: Selena DeckelmannDate: 2006-09-20 17:54:26
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!
Previous:From: Randal L. SchwartzDate: 2006-09-20 17:33:31
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group