Re: How to use result column names in having cause

From: "chris smith" <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrus <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to use result column names in having cause
Date: 2006-03-31 13:30:18
Message-ID: 3c1395330603310530o617a67bfqdcee459586b301f5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/31/06, Andrus <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee> wrote:
> >> In real application I have long expression instead of 123 and do'nt want
> >> repeat this expression in HAVING clause.
> >
> > You have to repeat the expression. "AS" changes the output name, it
> > can't be used either in the where clause or any other limiting factor
> > like 'having':
>
> Doc about HAVING condition says:
>
> Each column referenced in condition must unambiguously reference a grouping
> colum
>
> HAVING x> AVG(bar) unambiguously references to a grouping column x
>
> Is this bug ? It is very tedious to repeat same column expression in a
> multiple times: one time in column expression, and n times in having clause.

But you're not referencing x, you're trying to use AVG(bar) in your expression.

I assume it's this way because the standard says so.. one of the more
knowledgable list members will be able to confirm/deny this.

--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2006-03-31 14:19:05 Re: pgsql continuing network issues
Previous Message Andrus 2006-03-31 13:14:18 Re: How to use result column names in having cause