Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 signal code - first try

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 signal code - first try
Date: 2004-01-09 13:29:11
Message-ID: 3FFEACA7.5020505@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Claudio Natoli wrote:

>
>Just wondering if the logic for signal blocking is correct.
>Under Unix, IIRC, if a signal is blocked when raised, it will (might?) be
>delivered when that sigmask is unblocked. In the current implementation, it
>looks as though blocked signals will be forever lost. If I'm right in my
>recollection, we'll need some way to requeue the APC (which might be
>non-trivial).
>  
>

Yes, a blocked signal is deferred and eventually delivered when 
unblocked (it's slightly more complicated but this is close enough).

cheers

andrew


In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-01-09 13:33:13
Subject: Re: Win32 signal code - first try
Previous:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2004-01-09 11:44:58
Subject: Re: Win32 signal code - first try

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group