Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date: 2003-12-15 21:12:13
Message-ID: 3FDE23AD.6030706@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Have you looked at the CONNX signal code on the Win32 page:
>
>	http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html
>
>It uses shared memory and events.
>
>  
>

Yes, and I just did again. I guess I must be missing something, though - 
I don't see what in that code causes the signalled process to call the 
handler corresponding to the signal. Maybe I'm just a little brain dead 
today ...

andrew


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-15 21:21:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Previous:From: Michael BrusserDate: 2003-12-15 20:36:17
Subject: conversion_create.sql

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-15 21:21:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-15 19:44:09
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-15 21:21:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-15 19:44:09
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group