Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date: 2003-12-14 23:43:54
Message-ID: 3FDCF5BA.5030608@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
[moved to hackers / win32]

Claudio Natoli wrote:

>Or do people have strong leanings towards "fix as you go along"? Just feels
>like that way could see us getting bogged down making things "perfect"
>instead of advancing the port...
>
>  
>

w.r.t. Win32, I think the way to proceed is (in this order):
. make it work
. make it elegant
. make it fast

BTW, I agree with Bruce, you're doing excellent stuff. Now for the fun 
part (signals).

cheers

andrew


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-12-14 23:45:01
Subject: Re: Walker/mutator prototype.
Previous:From: Dennis BjorklundDate: 2003-12-14 23:31:10
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-12-14 23:53:22
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch
Previous:From: Dennis BjorklundDate: 2003-12-14 23:31:10
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-12-14 23:53:22
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch
Previous:From: Dennis BjorklundDate: 2003-12-14 23:31:10
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group