| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.5 Plans |
| Date: | 2003-11-28 05:38:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3FC6DF64.80301@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
>>I'm just interested in what everyone's personal plans for 7.5
>>development are?
> There are still some low-hanging fruit and some
> below-the-cloudy-sky-hanging fruit in there, for instance
[...snip...]
> Basic array support
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm planning to keep plugging away at this one, particularly the items
pointed out by Peter last July.
I'm also hoping to work on aggregates that accept two arguments (binary
set functions), e.g. REGR_*, and possibly window frame aggregates (both
ala SQL2003 section 4.15.4 and 10.9). Both could be classified as OLAP
functionality.
Possibly more stuff.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oli Sennhauser | 2003-11-28 08:40:45 | Re: pg_restore and create FK without verification check |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-28 01:20:12 | Re: Encoding problem with 7.4 |