Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COMMENT ON mega patch

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON mega patch
Date: 2003-11-22 02:57:33
Message-ID: 3FBED09D.9090102@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> * You were using a bare C string as the amname argument in COMMENT ON
> OPERATOR CLASS.  This won't do because the parse tree is not a valid
> Node structure; copyObject will fail on it.  I inserted makeString()
> and strVal() calls to fix it.
> 
> BTW, a simple test to detect uncopiable-parsetree problems is to compile
> with COPY_PARSE_PLAN_TREES defined.  Doing so revealed that you're not
> the only person to have made this mistake lately --- ALTER SEQUENCE is
> broken too.

Ok.

> * I made the macros LARGE and OBJECT be LARGE_P and OBJECT_P; they
> seemed just a little too ripe for conflicts as-is ...
 >
> * The pg_dump code for COMMENT ON OPCLASS pretty obviously had not been
> tested :-(

Hrm.  Yeah, weird.  I think I just forgot, because I learned in this 
patch that you can't do two of those %s in the append function, and I 
had fixed it in all the other dumps. *sigh*

The other thing I was concerned about was a bit of code duplication, 
especially for the comment on opclass function.

Out of interest, I notice you didn't commit my inv_api.c change to 
delete comments on LOBs - where did you put it instead?

Chris



In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-11-22 03:02:15
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON mega patch
Previous:From: Craig BostonDate: 2003-11-21 23:55:54
Subject: PATCH: Uninitialized variable usage in contrib/pg_autovacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group