Re: 4 Clause license?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 4 Clause license?
Date: 2003-11-20 19:38:57
Message-ID: 3FBD1851.5060609@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Based on the below wouldn't they also have to go after Microsoft?

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>><troll>Of course, now that SCO is claiming ownership of BSD code .....
>></troll>
>>
>>
>
>Interesting thread that ... last I read on the FreeBSD lists was
>speculation that they would be going after ppl like Cisco (re: TCP/IP
>Networking Code) since there really is nobody else large enough to bother
>with ... its going to be interesting to see :)
>
>----
>Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-20 19:47:45 Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-20 19:20:24 Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?