Re: More detail on settings for pgavd?

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More detail on settings for pgavd?
Date: 2003-11-19 06:32:23
Message-ID: 3FBB0E77.4020105@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:

> Shridhar,
>
> I was looking at the -V/-v and -A/-a settings in pgavd, and really don't
> understand how the calculation works. According to the readme, if I set -v
> to 1000 and -V to 2 (the defaults) for a table with 10,000 rows, pgavd would
> only vacuum after 21,000 rows had been updated. This seems wrong.
>
> Can you clear this up a little? I'd like to tweak these settings but can't
> without being better aquainted with the calculation.
>
> Also, you may want to reverse your default ratio for Vacuum/analyze frequency.
> True, analyze is a less expensive operation than Vacuum, but it's also needed
> less often -- only when the *distribution* of data changes. I've seen
> databases where the optimal vacuum/analyze frequency was every 10 min/once
> per day.

Will look into it. Give me a day or so. I am planning couple of other patches as
well. May be over week end.

Is this urgent?

Shridhar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-19 09:11:55 Re: Build farm
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-11-19 06:22:59 Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-11-19 06:34:12 Re: High Processor consumption
Previous Message Benjamin Bostow 2003-11-19 01:19:14 High Processor consumption