Josh Berkus wrote:
> I was looking at the -V/-v and -A/-a settings in pgavd, and really don't
> understand how the calculation works. According to the readme, if I set -v
> to 1000 and -V to 2 (the defaults) for a table with 10,000 rows, pgavd would
> only vacuum after 21,000 rows had been updated. This seems wrong.
> Can you clear this up a little? I'd like to tweak these settings but can't
> without being better aquainted with the calculation.
> Also, you may want to reverse your default ratio for Vacuum/analyze frequency.
> True, analyze is a less expensive operation than Vacuum, but it's also needed
> less often -- only when the *distribution* of data changes. I've seen
> databases where the optimal vacuum/analyze frequency was every 10 min/once
> per day.
Will look into it. Give me a day or so. I am planning couple of other patches as
well. May be over week end.
Is this urgent?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Shridhar Daithankar||Date: 2003-11-19 06:34:12|
|Subject: Re: High Processor consumption|
|Previous:||From: Benjamin Bostow||Date: 2003-11-19 01:19:14|
|Subject: High Processor consumption|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-11-19 09:11:55|
|Subject: Re: Build farm|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2003-11-19 06:22:59|
|Subject: Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the|