Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Date: 2003-11-13 04:17:56
Message-ID: 3FB305F4.2030107@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Apologies. Here's the patch. There may be other very minor differences 
in wording, too. But if that's all I missed I won't think I did too 
badly :-)

cheers

andrew

Tom Lane wrote:

>What's become of initdb's initial note about who you are?
>
>$ initdb
>The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "postgres".
>This user must also own the server process.
>... etc etc...
>
>The first two lines of printout don't seem to be in the "highly
>compatible" C version.
>
>  
>

Attachment: initdb.c.patch
Description: text/plain (622 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-11-13 04:23:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-13 03:52:42
Subject: Re: ARC buffer strategy committed

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-11-13 04:23:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-13 03:53:12
Subject: Re: "make check" improvement for cygwin

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-11-13 04:23:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-13 02:29:00
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group