Re: Open Sourcing pgManage

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Date: 2003-11-04 19:52:11
Message-ID: 3FA8036B.9050804@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?

J

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Joshua D. Drake writes:
>
>
>
>> I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
>>people's thoughts on
>>this?
>>
>>
>
>I think the decision has been made that no new client applications will be
>included with PostgreSQL. We will provide a server and let a happy bunch
>of client applications and libraries develop around it. That has worked
>out pretty well lately, I think.
>
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-04 19:53:10 Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-04 19:44:02 Re: Open Sourcing pgManage