Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Subject: Re: 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...
Date: 2003-11-04 18:55:39
Message-ID: 3FA7F62B.4090803@bigfoot.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> 
> 
>>I agree in general with you for these "general" arguments, but here we 
>>are talking about to introduce a sleep ( removable by guc ) or not! What 
>>about the hash refactoring introduced with 7.4? Are you going to
>>discourage people to use the hash?
> 
> 
> Hashed subselect handling was tested by lots of people during a lot of
> time, and was subject of the working port reports the last few days.
> This patch has had none of those.
> 
> Of course, if you want to patch your servers with it no one will stop
> you, but it will be _your_ responsability.  You can do any amount of
> testing you want to make sure it's good enough for you.  And you are
> welcome to report how it did behave.

I will with pleasure.


Regards
Gaetano Mendola



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: markwDate: 2003-11-04 19:03:17
Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-11-04 18:51:41
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group