Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak
Date: 2003-11-04 17:06:33
Message-ID: 3FA7DC99.2040300@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:

><snip> excellent scheme for improving List </snip>
>  
>

Just a thought - if we are messing with the List definition should we at 
the same time address the strict aliasing issues arising from Node's 
multiple personalities (I think it is the main offender).

Or is the intention never to do this, or not any time soon? (Either is 
OK, although I suspect it will have to happen sometime as more compilers 
start relying on the C99 rules more aggressively).

cheers

andrew


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-04 17:07:34
Subject: Re: bufmgr code question
Previous:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2003-11-04 17:02:51
Subject: minor suggestion about rule syntax

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-04 17:31:21
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-04 16:40:45
Subject: Re: equal() perf tweak

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group