Tom Lane wrote:
>"Stephen" <jleelim(at)xxxxxx(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Great! I haven't tried it yet, but I love the thought of it already :-)
>>I've been waiting for something like this for the past 2 years and now it's
>>going to make my multi-gigabyte PostgreSQL more usable and responsive. Will
>>the delay be tunable per VACUUM invocation?
>>
>>
>
>As the patch is set up, you just do "SET vacuum_page_delay = n" and
>then VACUUM.
>
>
probably a setting that autovacuum will tweak based on things like table
size etc.... If we can find a way to automatically tweak it that makes
sense.