Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: status?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: status?
Date: 2003-10-31 18:53:12
Message-ID: 3FA2AF98.7040901@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Merlin Moncure wrote:

>Did your initdb/signals patch get accepted or is that still an open
>item?
>
>Merlin
>
>  
>
I have finished work on rewriting initdb in C - see 
http://www.dunslane.net/~andrew/Initdb_In_C.html . I guess Bruce will 
merge it when he gets time (presumably after this release is wrapped up).

This wasn't so much a patch as a complete re-implementation from scratch 
- signal handling was just a very small part of it.

But it can't really be thoroughly tested on W32 until we have a working 
backend - I am assuming at that stage some tweaks will be required.

cheers

andrew


In response to

  • Re: status? at 2003-10-31 18:18:25 from Merlin Moncure

Responses

  • Re: status? at 2003-11-10 23:45:13 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2003-11-01 08:42:21
Subject: Other Win32 TODO items?
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2003-10-31 18:18:25
Subject: Re: status?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group