| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Press Release |
| Date: | 2003-10-30 00:53:57 |
| Message-ID: | 3FA06125.7010208@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>If your max_fsm_pages is set to higher than the level of data pages you
>recycle between vacuums, and you don't run out of memory on the machine for
>significant periods, then you need never do a vacuum_full.
>
>
>
I knew that it would delay the need for a vacuum full but I didn't know
it could
potentially eliminate it. O.k.
>The functionality in 7.4 extends this to indexes, eliminating the REINDEX in
>most cases.
>
>
>
Interesting.
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-10-30 00:57:14 | Re: Press Release |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-30 00:38:49 | Re: Press Release |