| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION |
| Date: | 2003-10-27 09:26:27 |
| Message-ID: | 3F9CE4C3.2000609@bigfoot.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I think because START TRANSACTION is SQL standard? However, I thought
>> BEGIN WORK was SQL standard, and we don't support READ ONLY there
>> either --- hmmm.
>
>
> BEGIN is no part of the SQL standard. The only way to begin a
> transaction under the SQL standard is START TRANSACTION.
These IMHO means push people to not use BEGIN anymore.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-27 09:57:30 | Re: Call for port reports |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-27 09:00:14 | Re: BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-27 17:14:05 | Re: PostgreSQL Patch: Test-and-set routine for HP-UX (IA-64) |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-27 09:00:14 | Re: BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION |