Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Date: 2003-10-22 01:34:51
Message-ID: 3F95DEBB.6070502@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> Reviewed, tested, applied.

Thanks.

>>maybe should test all the other qualified functions?
> 
> 
> What other qualified functions?  There might possibly be some issues in
> contrib stuff, but there are no other SQL-language functions defined in
> the main system (except information_schema, which we already checked).

Sorry - I meant "other functions that are now properly qualified in my 
patch".  ie, you have already tested them.

Chris


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mike PreeceDate: 2003-10-22 01:39:51
Subject: Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-10-22 01:32:55
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-22 02:49:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-10-22 01:27:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group