> Reviewed, tested, applied.
>>maybe should test all the other qualified functions?
> What other qualified functions? There might possibly be some issues in
> contrib stuff, but there are no other SQL-language functions defined in
> the main system (except information_schema, which we already checked).
Sorry - I meant "other functions that are now properly qualified in my
patch". ie, you have already tested them.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mike Preece||Date: 2003-10-22 01:39:51|
|Subject: Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2003-10-22 01:32:55|
|Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-10-22 02:49:47|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? |
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2003-10-22 01:27:39|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?|