Re: Bug Report

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: "Branden R(dot) Williams" <brw(at)brw(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug Report
Date: 2003-10-08 21:58:13
Message-ID: 3F848875.3040908@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Branden R. Williams wrote:
> ============================================================================
> POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE
> ============================================================================
> Your name : Branden R. Williams
> Your email address : brw(at)brw(dot)net
> System Configuration
> ---------------------
> Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : Intel Pentium
> Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : Linux 2.4.18 ELF
> PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.3.4): PostgreSQL-7.3.4
> Compiler used (example: gcc 2.95.2) : Your RPM, RH 8.
> Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
> ------------------------------------------------
> When using the replace() function, it appears that some of the output is
> filtered through a printf variant. If you have legitimate db characters
> that are also printf flags, it causes big problems.

This was fixed for 7.3.4 (or so I thought); see:
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c.diff?r1=1.92&r2=1.92.2.1
Are you sure you don't have something earlier? Was does
select version();
show?

Joe

In response to

  • Bug Report at 2003-10-07 21:12:57 from Branden R. Williams

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-08 22:00:34 Re: Minor irritant with comment parsing in a function (SQL)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-08 21:33:11 Re: Minor irritant with comment parsing in a function (SQL)