Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 Features

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 Features
Date: 2003-10-08 04:21:50
Message-ID: 3F8390DE.9060202@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
> This is a big one, although you might like to note that according to
> Tom, not all the cases of index growth might be fixed (there was a
> thread on -hackers about this recently).

It's a nice one - but given that probably 90% of postgres users don't 
even know it exists, surely we don't want to get more bad publicity? :)

Chris



In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-10-08 06:43:24
Subject: Re: 7.4 Features
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-08 04:18:44
Subject: Re: 7.4 Features

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group