From:
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To:
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc:
"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, rainer(dot)klute(at)epost(dot)de,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, klute(at)rainer-klute(dot)de
Subject:
Re: Oracle/PostgreSQL incompatibilities
Date:
2003-10-04 06:50:03
Message-ID:
3F7E6D9B.8070702@paradise.net.nz (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2003-10-02 06:37:12 from Rainer Klute <rainer(dot)klute(at)epost(dot)de>
2003-10-03 15:35:28 from Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
2003-10-03 15:53:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-03 16:12:58 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-04 03:26:36 from Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
2003-10-04 06:50:03 from Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
2003-10-05 05:30:55 from Rainer Klute <rainer(dot)klute(at)epost(dot)de>
2003-10-06 18:34:44 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Finger or brain trouble, here is the correction :
>NUMBER -> INTEGER when transporting schemas from Oracle to Pg.
>(This needs a little care - as NUMBER in Oracle has bigger *precision*
than INTEGER in Pg)
Thinking about this a bit more, its probably fine to just substitute
NUMERIC for NUMBER, but obviously INTEGER is going to perform better if
it can be used.
regards
Mark
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2003-10-04 08:09:49
Subject : Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2003-10-04 03:55:42
Subject : Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...