Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL

From: Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>
To: Matt Christian <matt(at)summersault(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org,Mark Stosberg <mark(at)summersault(dot)com>
Subject: Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL
Date: 2003-10-03 17:07:55
Message-ID: 3F7DACEB.8090709@future.ee (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
> The project will be ported form an existing codebase which uses Oracle
> as the backend.

As your developers have Oracle experience and are thus probably used to 
take some things "logically granted", then just in case you end up with 
MySQL after all you might find the following link to be a timesaver. 
It's a list of MySQL's documented non-bugs.

http://sql-info.de/mysql/

Kaarel


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jason HihnDate: 2003-10-03 18:04:09
Subject: Re: Which database?
Previous:From: Ryan MahoneyDate: 2003-10-03 15:10:59
Subject: Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group