| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |
| Date: | 2003-10-01 20:02:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3F7B32E7.1030209@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>and the question as i thought was being discussed (or should be
>discussed) was what is the level of interest in having this work kept in
>the community cvs tree vs. someone else's quasi-forked branch...
>
>
It is my thinking that regardless of commercial backing that the
PostgreSQL project as a whole would gain better validity
within the commercial world if we maintained releases longer.
It is really irrelevant whether somebody pays me or you 500.00 buck to
make a patch and submit it to the tree. What is
relevant IMHO is that the community is backing a release for longer than
12-18 months.
Yes a commercial company could just pick it up and say ... hey we will
support it for x (Mammoth 7.3.4 is supported until 2005 for example)
but I was more looking at this from an overall community perspective.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>Robert Treat
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-01 20:03:44 | initdb |
| Previous Message | Maksim Likharev | 2003-10-01 20:01:52 | FreeSpaceMap hashtable out of memory |