Re: TPC-R benchmarks

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: Oleg Lebedev <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org>
Cc: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie(at)osdl(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jenny Zhang <jenny(at)osdl(dot)org>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TPC-R benchmarks
Date: 2003-09-29 14:47:35
Message-ID: 3F784607.5020705@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Oleg Lebedev wrote:
> effective_cache_size = 32000 # typically 8KB each

That is 256MB. You can raise it to 350+MB if nothing else is running on the box.
Also if you have fast disk drives, you can reduce random page cost to 2 or 1.5.

I don't know how much this will make any difference to benchmark results but
usually this helps when queries are slow.

HTH

Shridhar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Franco Bruno Borghesi 2003-09-29 14:59:27 Re: Performance: BigInt vs Decimal(19,0)
Previous Message Oleg Lebedev 2003-09-29 14:35:51 Re: TPC-R benchmarks