Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TPC-R benchmarks

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: Oleg Lebedev <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org>
Cc: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie(at)osdl(dot)org>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jenny Zhang <jenny(at)osdl(dot)org>,pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TPC-R benchmarks
Date: 2003-09-29 14:47:35
Message-ID: 3F784607.5020705@persistent.co.in (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Oleg Lebedev wrote:
> effective_cache_size = 32000	# typically 8KB each

That is 256MB. You can raise it to 350+MB if nothing else is running on the box. 
Also if you have fast disk drives, you can reduce random page cost to 2 or 1.5.

I don't know how much this will make any difference to benchmark results but 
usually this helps when queries are slow.

  HTH

  Shridhar


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Franco Bruno BorghesiDate: 2003-09-29 14:59:27
Subject: Re: Performance: BigInt vs Decimal(19,0)
Previous:From: Oleg LebedevDate: 2003-09-29 14:35:51
Subject: Re: TPC-R benchmarks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group