Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola writes:
>>one question just to know the right action to take:
>>After having submitted a patch in order to work on a
>>new patch shall I open another fresh CVS snapshot or shall
>>I work on top of my old patch not yet applied ( or refused )?
> Since applying the patch will change the CVS header in the affected files,
> this will mess up your next diff. Details depend on how you work exactly,
> but I remember having been burned by this exact issue several times. If
> your new work depends on your old patch being applied, then you'll just
> have to keep an extended set of working and reference trees around.
Ok, I will take a fresh sandbox then.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-09-27 14:06:15|
|Subject: Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2003-09-27 00:24:09|
|Subject: Re: NLS changes|