(moving to advocacy)
Christopher Browne wrote:
> - The main Tuxedo reseller that I am aware of is PeopleSoft, who use
> it for their "high traffic" clients. Anyone that has seen news lately
> knows that they and Oracle aren't exactly "best pals" these days;
> having another DB option could be helpful to them...
That's an interesting observation, because I've long thought PeopleSoft
ought to support Postgres too. From what I recall, their database schema
is *very* database neutral (at least as of PSFT version 7.x) and fairly
simple (we ran it on MSSQL 6.5). It would probably be pretty easily
ported to run on Postgres.
I wonder how we could get them to consider it...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai||Date: 2003-08-28 06:23:51|
|Subject: Weird constraint output|
|Previous:||From: Dennis Björklund||Date: 2003-08-28 05:07:14|
|Subject: Re: Date input changed in 7.4 ?|
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: いま、欲しいは「３億円」と「保証」のどちら！それとも両方。||Date: 2003-08-28 06:06:11|
|Previous:||From: Roderick A. Anderson||Date: 2003-08-28 05:33:44|
|Subject: Re: ads on postgresql.org broken|