| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Advocacy (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit |
| Date: | 2003-08-28 05:46:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3F4D9752.3080409@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
(moving to advocacy)
Christopher Browne wrote:
> - The main Tuxedo reseller that I am aware of is PeopleSoft, who use
> it for their "high traffic" clients. Anyone that has seen news lately
> knows that they and Oracle aren't exactly "best pals" these days;
> having another DB option could be helpful to them...
That's an interesting observation, because I've long thought PeopleSoft
ought to support Postgres too. From what I recall, their database schema
is *very* database neutral (at least as of PSFT version 7.x) and fairly
simple (we ran it on MSSQL 6.5). It would probably be pretty easily
ported to run on Postgres.
I wonder how we could get them to consider it...
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | いま、欲しいは「３億円」と「保証」のどちら！それとも両方。 | 2003-08-28 06:06:11 | 未承諾広告＊個人でー２億・３億・５億９千万円収入者続出ー信じられないー証拠確認迎 |
| Previous Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2003-08-28 05:33:44 | Re: ads on postgresql.org broken |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai | 2003-08-28 06:23:51 | Weird constraint output |
| Previous Message | Dennis Björklund | 2003-08-28 05:07:14 | Re: Date input changed in 7.4 ? |