Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Date: 2003-07-31 09:36:09
Message-ID: 3F28E309.8060008@pse-consulting.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:

>
>Applied with some editorializing.  In particular, I don't believe the
>original did the right thing with (a - (b - c)).
>
>	
>

Oops, missed that case...
But now, we have (a + ( b + c)) again.
A patch that removes parentheses for + and * is appended.

Regards,
Andfdsa


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2003-07-31 09:37:42
Subject: [Fwd: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option]
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-07-31 09:02:01
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group