Tom Lane wrote:
>Applied with some editorializing. In particular, I don't believe the
>original did the right thing with (a - (b - c)).
Oops, missed that case...
But now, we have (a + ( b + c)) again.
A patch that removes parentheses for + and * is appended.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2003-07-31 09:37:42|
|Subject: [Fwd: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option]|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-07-31 09:02:01|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?|