Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Date: 2003-07-23 14:17:59
Message-ID: 3F1EE66F.22625.5302DBB@localhost (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 23 Jul 2003 at 10:08, Jeff wrote:

> I am sure that, for example, mysql will compile just fine on a 64 bit
> platform (given gcc of course), and it may actually run, but that doesn't
> mean it has been "tested" or "used in production".. so mysql (oracle, etc)
> can claim "64 bit compatibility" just like pg does, and pg doesn't win
> anything by using that terminology.

If mysql works on 64 bit platform, is it able to take advantage of 64bits? Is 
it 64 bit clean, in sense of ILP paradigm?

Bye
 Shridhar

--
First Law of Bicycling:	No matter which way you ride, it's uphill and against the wind.


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-07-23 14:38:50
Subject: 64 Bit Compatibility
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-07-23 14:16:47
Subject: Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group