Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tuning PostgreSQL

From: Ang Chin Han <angch(at)bytecraft(dot)com(dot)my>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL
Date: 2003-07-21 11:27:54
Message-ID: 3F1BCE3A.5080402@bytecraft.com.my (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:

> Good for you. You have time at hand to find out which one suits you best. Do 
> the testing before you have load that needs another FS..:-)

Kinda my point is that when we've more load, we'd be using RAID-0 over 
RAID-5, or getting faster SCSI drives, or even turn fsync off if that's 
a bottleneck, because the different filesystems do not have that much 
performance difference[1] -- the filesystem is not a bottleneck. Just 
need to tweak most of them a bit, like noatime,data=writeback.

[1] That is, AFAIK, from our testing. Please, please correct me if I'm 
wrong: has anyone found that different filesystems produces wildly 
different performance for postgresql, FreeBSD's filesystems not included?

-- 
Linux homer 2.4.18-14 #1 Wed Sep 4 13:35:50 EDT 2002 i686 i686 i386 
GNU/Linux
   7:00pm  up 207 days, 10:05,  5 users,  load average: 5.00, 5.03, 5.06

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-07-21 11:39:30
Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-07-21 10:31:41
Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group