From: | "Francisco Figueiredo Jr(dot)" <fxjrlists(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Carlos Guzman Alvarez <carlosga(at)telefonica(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Getting blocked when receinving response from a Parse |
Date: | 2003-06-29 01:56:55 |
Message-ID: | 3EFE4767.9030903@yahoo.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Carlos Guzman Alvarez wrote:
> Hello:
>
> >You must send either Flush or Sync after the Parse to force the backend
> >to emit its response to Parse. The assumption is that in many cases
> >you'll be sending Parse as part of a batch of commands, and the backend
> >should batch its responses to minimize the number of network packets
> >sent. So you have to tell it where the batch boundaries are --- thus,
> >Flush or Sync. See the docs concerning the difference between the two.
>
>
>
> I have the same problem some days ago with the implementation of the
> version 3.0 protocol in C# and now using Flush it's working quite well :)
>
>
Thanks Carlos.
Uhmmm, if you don't mind... are you implementing something like a data
provider for Postgresql, or it is just an ad hoc program?
--
Regards,
Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
------
"My grandfather once told me that there are two
kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me
to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-29 03:03:28 | Re: Missing array support |
Previous Message | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. | 2003-06-29 01:54:11 | Re: Getting blocked when receinving response from a Parse |